Courts seem to be embracing the "culture shift" advocated by the Supreme Court in Hryniak.
In King Lofts Toronto I Ltd. v. Emmons, 2014 ONCA 215 (C.A.), the plaintiff sued for solicitor's negligence in connection with a commercial real estate transaction. The defendants brought a summary judgment motion to dismiss the claim on the basis of an expired limitation period. The motions judge dismissed the motion, but went a step further, granting summary judgment for the plaintiffs on the basis that the defendants had acted negligently.
The defendants appealed and the Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal. It held that the evidence was clear that there was a duty to warn and the solicitor failed to do so. The Court of Appeal held that "the principles of proportionality and sensible management of the court process support the judge's ruling".
King Lofts shows a danger to bringing a summary judgment motion under the new Hryniak test. Is this an unintended consequence of the new regime or in line with a goal of reducing the number of cases that need a full blown trial?
Wednesday, 6 August 2014
Court Grants Summary Judgment Against Party Bringing Motion
Artikel Terkait Court Grants Summary Judgment Against Party Bringing Motion :
Supreme Court Sets Out The Test for Summary JudgmentThe Supreme Court has overturned the "full appreciation" test used by the Ontario Court of Appeal in summary judgment. The ...
The Agony of the CollisionA recent motion decision dealt with the standard of care in emergency situations.In Dubois v. Ford Credit Canada Leasing, 20 ...
Slip and Fall Action Dismissed on Summary Judgment MotionIn Occupier's Liability cases, it is important to remember that occupiers are not insurers.In Nandlal v. Toronto Transit Commissi ...
Timing of Summary Judgment MotionsAt what point in a lawsuit is it appropriate to bring a summary judgment motion?In Stever v. Rainbow International Carpet Dyeing ...
Negligent drivers liable to rescuers for injuries that are reasonably foreseeable A recent summary judgment motion dealt with the extent of the duty of care owed to rescuers.In Maguire v Padt, 2014 ONSC 60 ...
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment