Showing posts with label Duty to Defend. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Duty to Defend. Show all posts

Wednesday, 15 October 2014

The Test to Determine Whether an Insured "Permitted" the Unauthorized use of a Motor Vehicle

A recent decision looked at the test to determine whether an insured permitted someone else to drive his vehicle when she was not authoriz...
The Test to Determine Whether an Insured "Permitted" the Unauthorized use of a Motor Vehicle Rating: 4.5 Diposkan Oleh: Unknown

Wednesday, 1 October 2014

Automatic Renewal Section of Policy Does Not Obligate Insurer to Renew

Does an "automatic renewal" section in a home owner's policy require the insurer to renew?  A recent decision says "no...
Automatic Renewal Section of Policy Does Not Obligate Insurer to Renew Rating: 4.5 Diposkan Oleh: Unknown

Wednesday, 2 April 2014

Duty to Defend - Extrinsic Evidence Not Permitted

In Liardi v. Riotrin Properties (Kingston) Inc. , 2013 ONSC 7544 (S.C.J), the defendant, Future Shop, brought a motion for a declaration tha...
Duty to Defend - Extrinsic Evidence Not Permitted Rating: 4.5 Diposkan Oleh: Unknown

Wednesday, 12 February 2014

Claim for Contribution and Indemnity for Negligent Supervision Not Caught by Exclusion Clause

The Court of Appeal recently held that an insurer was obligated to defend a homeowner against a Third Party Claim alleging she failed to s...
Claim for Contribution and Indemnity for Negligent Supervision Not Caught by Exclusion Clause Rating: 4.5 Diposkan Oleh: Unknown

Wednesday, 14 August 2013

Excess Insurance

Excess insurers may be interested in the recently reported decision of ACE INA Insurance v. Associated Electric & Gas Insurance Services...
Excess Insurance Rating: 4.5 Diposkan Oleh: Unknown

Wednesday, 15 May 2013

Limitation Periods in Duty to Defend or Indemnify Cases

When does the limitation period begin to run in duty to defend or duty to indemnify cases? In Georgian Downs Ltd. v. State Farm Fire and Cas...
Limitation Periods in Duty to Defend or Indemnify Cases Rating: 4.5 Diposkan Oleh: Unknown

Wednesday, 8 May 2013

Insurer Obligated to Continue Paying Defence Costs

Jevco v. Malaviya,2013 ONSC 675 (S.C.J.). Malaviya was insured under a Standard Automobile Policy (SAP) with Jevco for the minimum liabili...
Insurer Obligated to Continue Paying Defence Costs Rating: 4.5 Diposkan Oleh: Unknown